Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

RGF NO CONJUR

Comments: 0

“A ação, na verdade, é aventura jurídica de péssimo gosto, que jamais deveria ter sido encampada pelo ilustre procurador que representou a autora”.  Com essas palavras, o desembargador Ruy Coppola, da 32ª Câmara de Direito Privado do Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo, negou provimento ao recurso de uma consumidora da Claro que pedia indenização de R$ 50 mil.

http://www.conjur.com.br/2015-fev-07/mulher-50-mil-claro-desembargador-nega-recurso


Nos siga nas redes sociais: